German artist born in 1972, working with photography, sculpture, collage, and installation. His practice often revisits existing images and cultural forms through repetition, copying, and displacement.
This site does not display work images. Please visit the official archives below.
Contents · Table of Contents
The work is organized around repetition, appropriation, display, distortion, and the unstable status of cultural memory in reproduced forms.*1*2
Photography is used together with collage, sculptural quotation, and spatial arrangement. Existing images and forms are reintroduced in altered scale or context so that recognition and estrangement happen together.*1*2
Representative examples: exhibition materials repeatedly emphasize borrowed forms and recursive image handling. These examples matter because they show Ullrich’s interest in how visual meaning persists through repetition and mutation.*1*2
This method matters because the work seems structured around the idea that culture is experienced through copies. By repeating and shifting images, Ullrich turns reproduction itself into the subject.*1*2
Historically, his work belongs to a 1990s and 2000s post-conceptual environment shaped by appropriation, circulation, and the erosion of medium purity. Photography is important here not as origin, but as one of many reproducible formats.*1*2
In relation to contemporaries and movements, he can be placed near artists working on post-appropriation image culture, where the interest lies in the social life of repeated visual forms.*1*2
Historically, Ullrich matters because he shows how photographic thinking survives beyond the single print, in processes of copying, recontextualization, and formal echo.*1*2
Critically, the interpretation emphasizes repetition as critical method. The point is not simply quotation, but the way repeated forms become unstable carriers of memory and value.*1*2
Gallery and institutional framing consistently stress copying, displacement, and the relation between image and object.*1*2
It is misleading to describing him as a straightforward photographer; the stronger claim is that his work extends photographic questions about repetition and reproduction into hybrid conceptual form.*1*2